About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Friday, July 11, 2014
ARCHIVES: Weekly Commentary: Hasbara dropping the ball – the illegal rockets

[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA - 11 July 2014: And Hasbara continues to drop the
ball. When the world - including the Obama team - rejoiced over the
Fatah-Hamas agreement for a unified PA the world justified its support by
citing the commitment of that unified PA to the obligations of the PA ([2
June 2014 Ceremony establishing unified PA government] Mahmoud Abbas:
"stressing the new government’s commitment to the obligations of the
Palestinian Authority and all previously signed agreements".)

Today we are being bombarded by rockets whose very existence in the Gaza
Strip represents a gross violation of these "previously signed agreements"
and the world - including the Obama team - only talks about a ceasefire.

No one is talking about the PA actually honoring "previously signed
agreements" and clearing out the illegal rockets.

And that "no one" includes official Israeli Hasbara.

We have a strong case.

We have agreements that are crystal clear.

The most eloquent Palestinian spokesman can't succeed in explaining that the
signed agreements actually allow those rockets in Gaza.

And our message is clear: it is not enough for anyone to call for a
ceasefire. Everyone must call for the removal of the rockets.]



Weekly Commentary: Hasbara dropping the ball - the illegal rockets

Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 1 May 2014

Mahmoud Abbas says the unified PA will honor its commitments.

And the phrase "honor its commitments" appears in pretty much every
statement made by every international figure talking about a unified PA.

But this phrase has been left bereft of meaning.

At most there is a reference to an expectation for quiet.

Let's be clear about this:

The PA is absolutely and unquestionably committed to the absence of rockets
in the Gaza Strip.

Here is the text of one such signed commitment:

Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
Washington, D.C., September 28, 1995
CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE XIV 4. Except for the arms, ammunition and equipment of
the Palestinian Police described in Annex I, and those of the Israeli
military forces, no organization, group or individual in the West Bank and
the Gaza Strip shall manufacture, sell, acquire, possess, import or
otherwise introduce into the West Bank or the Gaza Strip any firearms,
ammunition, weapons, explosives, gunpowder or any related equipment, unless
otherwise provided for in Annex I.

And here is the Annex - rockets are not in the list:

THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN INTERIM AGREEMENT ON THE WEST BANK AND THE GAZA
STRIP
Annex I ARTICLE IV 5. c. In the Gaza Strip, the Palestinian Police will
possess the following arms and equipment:
(1) 7,000 light personal weapons;
(2) up to 120 machine guns of 0.3" or 0.5" caliber; and
(3) up to 45 wheeled armored vehicles of a type to be agreed on between the
two sides, and of which 22 will be deployed in protecting Council
installations.

So anyone who can read a few sentences can see that the commitment is that
rockets are not in Gaza.

Again: the commitment is not that rockets aren't FIRED from Gaza. It is
that rockets do not EXIST in Gaza.

"Quiet for quiet" might be an appropriate policy and goal in a stand-off
with Hamas. But it is not what should be expected from the PA.

This is not just a question of trying to gain points in public opinion.

The "quiet for quiet" policy is a cancer that started in the 70's when we
accepted the gross Egyptian violation of an American brokered cease-fire
with the movement of SAM missiles to the Suez Canal. The same SAM's that
played such a deadly role in facilitating the Egyptian crossing of the Suez
Canal a few years later in the bloody 1973 Yom Kippur War.

"Quiet for quiet" allowed a monstrous threat to build up in South Lebanon
and again in the Gaza Strip.

And if we indicate that we accept the continuation of the "quiet for quiet"
policy even when the Gaza Strip is ostensibly part of a unified PA then
inevitably the "quiet for quiet" cancer will make its way to the West Bank.

No.

The commitment not to have rockets in the Gaza Strip is not some obscure,
arcane and insignificant commitment.

It's a core commitment.

And it is high time that Israeli officials make this crystal clear.

"Quiet for quiet" is not enough for the PA.

If the PA controls the Gaza Strip then the rockets must go.

Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)
(Mail POB 982 Kfar Sava)
Tel 972-9-7604719/Fax 972-3-7255730
INTERNET ADDRESS: imra@netvision.net.il
Website: http://www.imra.org.il

Search For An Article

....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)