Hamas Policy after Operation “Protective Edge”
Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi
Jerusalem Issue Briefs
Vol. 14, No. 29 September 18, 2014
http://jcpa.org/article/hamas-policy/

-Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal recently revealed Hamas’ unfolding strategy in
the wake of the Gaza war, particularly the use of the international system
as an economic safety net after every terror offensive.
-Hamas will use international legal instruments to participate in the
Palestinians’ delegitimization campaign that seeks ultimately to bring an
end to the State of Israel.
-Mashaal understands that the use of violence and terror does not incur
punitive measures against Gaza by the international community. On the
contrary, it is remunerated with generous economic aid for rehabilitation
and development.
-Hamas’ real aim is to use the Palestinian national reconciliation to
infiltrate the PLO and wrest control from within.

The war in Gaza ended after 51 days of fighting, but it was one more chapter
in the long-term struggle over the land. Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal and
other heads of the movement have been portraying this latest war (called
“Protective Edge” by Israel and “Expendable Chaff” by the Palestinians) as a
tremendous “victory” of the Palestinian people over the Israeli army. The
victory was achieved, they say, mainly through steadfastness and the
improved military capacities of the Al-Qassam Brigades and the Palestinian
organizations, which supported an ongoing assault on Israeli civilian and
strategic targets and deterred the IDF from conquering Gaza and overthrowing
Hamas.

During a conference Mashaal attended on September 13 in Tunisia, he heard
leaders express full support for Hamas. Mashaal presented the conference
with the five strategy guidelines Hamas has formulated since the war.1

Khaled Mashaal - Hamas Policy after Operation “Protective Edge”


Goal 1: Rehabilitating Gaza

Mashaal stressed the importance of rapid rehabilitation of the civilian
infrastructures that were damaged in the war. He called on the international
community and the Arab and Muslim states to extend urgent economic
assistance, and declared that the funds would not be exploited by any
political actor but would instead be funneled to the welfare of the
residents.

“We are not directing [the financial assistance] to anyone. We are saying to
the Arabs and the Muslims and the international community: go to Gaza and
provide aid to the residents. We do not want to exploit this for the good of
a party or a movement. We want to serve the people. It is they who created
this war and they are entitled to rapid assistance from us,” said Mashaal.

This goal reflects Hamas’ strategic thinking and is based on past
experience. It takes into account the fact that the use of violence and
terror does not incur punitive measures against Gaza by the international
community. On the contrary, it is remunerated with generous economic aid for
rehabilitation and development, which directly or indirectly helps build up
Hamas’ military capabilities for the next assault on Israel. The aid that
the international community extends to Gaza after a terror offensive
actually constitutes an economic safety net for the Hamas government, for
its adherence to terror, and for its efforts to overthrow the Palestinian
Authority headed by Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) and bring about the
destruction of the State of Israel.

Goal 2—Completing the Palestinian Internal National Reconciliation

Mashaal called for reorganizing the “Palestinian house” in light of the
reconciliation agreement that Hamas reached with the Palestinian Authority
and Fatah, which stipulated a unity government (established in June 2014);
new elections for Palestinian governmental institutions; and the rebuilding
of the PLO institutions with, for the first time, the participation of Hamas
representatives. Mashaal asserted that the main objective of the national
reconciliation, in which he also assigns a role to the Arabs of Israel, is
to mobilize all forces for the campaign to liberate Palestine and bring back
the refugees.

Hamas’ real aim is to use the national reconciliation to infiltrate the PLO
and wrest control from within. Since the international community recognizes
the PLO as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, Hamas
would thereby take the reins of the Palestinian national movement. The
readiness for a real governmental partnership with Fatah is not sincere but
rather a Trojan horse for appropriating the Palestinian leadership. Along
with the reconciliation agreement, Hamas has sought to spark a third
Intifada in the West Bank while also working to topple the PA government. It
was the exposure of this plan by the Israeli security services and the
arrest of about a hundred Hamas operatives that foiled its realization.2

Goal 3: Affirming Struggle and Rejecting Negotiations

“We must learn the great lesson of Gaza, which is that the enemy only
understands the language of force,” Mashaal declared, “and we as
Palestinians must learn this lesson from the Gaza war. For those who have
conducted pointless negotiations for over 20 years the most important lesson
is that negotiations that are not backed by power and struggle add up to
begging for donations on the doorstep of the enemies.”

He added, “We support a political and diplomatic process and all forms of
the struggle; however, everything must be based on the struggle/resistance
[muqawama], which creates the conditions for victory and forces the enemy to
leave our land as it left Gaza and before that southern Lebanon….Through
safeguarding the victory in Gaza we will complete the task and not revert to
the failed approach of negotiations.” Mashaal did not rule out a return to
armed struggle and the resumption of hostilities with Israel.

“The seeds of devotion [to the struggle]” Mashaal continued, “exist in Gaza
and similarly in Al-Quds [Jerusalem], on the West Bank and in every grain of
our Palestinian soil. What enabled Gaza to triumph? The preparations and the
resolve. Tens of thousands of our children and our people engaged in
manufacturing weapons and digging tunnels, in steadfastness, in overcoming
the siege and its barriers, and did not submit to the difficult conditions
that had to be surmounted for the sake of the struggle.”

Mashaal presented this account of how Hamas waged the struggle against
Israel: “We set the goals…and then we delineated the strategy and the
tactics; we made use of all the components of Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim
power; we reached agreement on ways to conduct the struggle in its general
aspects and in its details, in strategy and in tactics; we knew when to
escalate and when to hold back; and the decision on peace and war was not in
anyone’s hands exclusively.”

The independent Palestinian entity in Gaza, which actually is under Hamas
rule, thus adhered to an uncompromising jihadist line that competes with and
rejects the political approach of the Palestinian Authority. This effort is
aided by the broad support that the Hamas entity in Gaza receives in the
Arab and Muslim world, the guaranteed economic support from the United
Nations and the West, and the mobilization of the leftist and human rights
organizations against Israel in its war against Hamas (or the “liberal”
forces in the world, as Mashaal called them in other statements made in this
context).3

Goal 4: A Legal Campaign against Israel

The leader of Hamas, a terror organization that shelters a long list of
other terror organizations including branches of Al-Qaeda and Islamic State,
emphasizes the use of international legal instruments to weaken Israel while
assuming that these instruments will not turn into a double-edged sword for
Hamas. Mashaal demanded that the Palestinian Authority sign the Rome
Convention so that the Palestinians can press “war crimes” charges against
Israel at the International Criminal Court in The Hague. He expressed no
fear that Israel might press similar charges against the Palestinians.

“We say to the world,” Mashaal proclaimed, “that this entity [i.e., Israel]
has become a burden to the West and the East and the human community, an
entity that is a burden on international Christianity and on Judaism in the
world, rebelling against ethics and morality. The desire of some of the
international powers to grant it a role has exhausted itself and come to an
end — if it ever had a role at all. And it will no longer be suited to any
role on behalf of the imperialist powers.”

In other words, Hamas sees the legal instruments of the international
community as a powerful means at its disposal to pursue the delegitimization
of Israel and invalidate its existence both for “ethical and moral” reasons
and for its being a “burden” and “without [strategic] value” to the West.

Goal 5: Putting Palestine at the Top of the Arab and Muslim Nation’s
Priorities

“We say to the Arabs and the Muslims in their [different] regions: this is
the real struggle, you and we should make it our first priority because the
Zionist enterprise endangers all of you,” said Mashaal. He avoided
addressing the situation in the Arab world, including the rise of the
Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, the instability in other Arab countries,
and the Iranian ambitions in the region. He presented Israel as the cardinal
enemy of the Muslim nation, actually adopting the political line of Iran,
with which Mashaal continues to strengthen Hamas’ strategic alliance to the
consternation of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states.

* * *

Notes

1 http://felesteen.ps/nd/releases////2014/092014/14

2 http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4560057,00.html

3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h5JT6zBT6s

---------------------------

About Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi

Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi is a senior researcher of the Middle East
and radical Islam at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He is a
co-founder of the Orient Research Group Ltd.