About Us






Thursday, January 2, 2014
Kerry cites Vietnam example for Israel in remarks with Netanyahu

[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA:

I honestly had to wait to see the transcript because I could not believe my

But there it is.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry citing Vietnam as an example.

Here is what he said:

"On a personal level, last month I traveled to Vietnam on my first visit
there as Secretary of State. And the transformation in our relationship – I
was a young soldier who fought there – the transformation in our
relationship is proof that as painful as the past can be, through hard work
of diplomacy history’s adversaries can actually become partners for a new
day and history’s challenges can become opportunities for a new age."

A reminder of what happened in Vietnam:

#1. A peace agreement was engineered by then Secretary of State Henry

#2. Henry Kissinger received a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts.

#3. The agreement fails.

#4. South Vietnam falls as American forces retreat.

#5. The "boat people" - a flood of refugees from South Vietnam fleeing for
their lives.

Now what is the message to Israel?

That John Kerry also expects to get a Nobel Peace Prize regardless of what
happens afterwards and that whatever happens after Israel falls, the United
States will ultimately transform its relationship with the force that takes
over the Jewish State and become a partner of that force?



Remarks of PM Netanyahu and Secretary of
State Kerry before meeting

Remarks of PM Netanyahu and Secretary of State Kerry before meeting

John Kerry
Secretary of State
Prime Minister's Office


January 2, 2014

PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU: Welcome back to Jerusalem, John. I want to use
this opportunity to express once again my personal appreciation and the
appreciation of the people of Israel for your unremitting personal efforts
to advance peace between us and the Palestinians. I know that you’re
committed to peace, I know that I’m committed to peace, but unfortunately,
given the actions and words of Palestinian leaders, there’s growing doubt in
Israel that the Palestinians are committed to peace.

A few days ago in Ramallah, President Abbas embraced terrorists as heroes.
To glorify the murders of innocent women and men as heroes is an outrage.
How can President Abbas says – how can he say that he stands against
terrorism when he embraces the perpetrators of terrorism and glorifies them
as heroes? He can’t stand against terrorists and stand with the terrorists.
And I’m wondering what a young Palestinian would think when he sees the
leader of the Palestinian people embrace people who axed innocent men and
women – axed their heads or blew them up or riddled them with bullets – what’s
a young Palestinian supposed to think about the future? What’s he supposed
to think about what he should do vis-a-vis Israelis and vis-a-vis the state
of Israel? So it’s not surprising that in recent weeks Israel has been
subjected to a growing wave of terrorist attacks. President Abbas didn’t see
fit to condemn these attacks, even after we learned that at least in one
case – I stress, at least in one case – those who served and are serving in
the Palestinian security forces took part in them.

In the six months since the start of peace negotiations, the Palestinian
Authority continues its unabated incitement against the state of Israel.
This Palestinian Government incitement is rampant. You see it in the
state-controlled media – the government-controlled media – in the schools,
in textbooks, in kindergartens. You see it at every part of Palestinian
society. So instead of preparing Palestinians for peace, Palestinian leaders
are teaching them to hate Israel. This is not the way to achieve peace.
President Abbas must lead his people away from terror and incitement,
towards reconciliation and peace.

John, the people of Israel and I are prepared to make such an historic
peace, but we must have a Palestinian partner who’s equally prepared to make
this peace. Peace means ending incitement; it means fighting terrorism and
condemning terrorism; it means recognizing Israel as the nation-state of the
Jewish people; it means meeting Israel’s security needs; and it means being
prepared to truly end the conflict once and for all. If we’re to succeed in
our joint effort, President Abbas must reject terror and embrace peace. I
hope he doesn’t miss again the opportunity to give Israelis and Palestinians
a better future.

Mr. Secretary, John, I look forward to continuing our discussions. I hope
that together we can forge a way to a genuine and lasting peace, a secure
peace, because the only peace that will endure in the Middle East as it
really is, is a peace that Israel can defend. I’m determined above all else
to defend my people and my state, and I will never compromise on the
security of Israel and its citizens and on the vital interests that protect
our future. I think you know, John, more than most, how important it is to
ensure the security of Israel. And I hope that despite the shifting sands in
the Middle East, together we can build a rock-solid foundation for security
and for a secure peace. And that’s the job we’re going to do in the coming
days and weeks.


SECRETARY KERRY: Thank you, sir. Thank you, Bibi. Thank you. Well, thank you
very much Mr. Prime Minister, my friend Bibi.

And let me begin by saying to all the people of Israel that our thoughts, my
thoughts, are with the Sharon family as they sit in vigil with the former
prime minister of Israel, Arik Sharon. We remember his contributions,
sacrifices he made to ensure the survival and the well-being of Israel, and
I have many personal thoughts about my meetings with him on many different
occasions – always robust and strong and clear about his positions. And so
we all join – all Americans are thinking of Israel and their leader, former
leader, and of the vigil that is taking place now at a very personal level
with his family.

It is always a great pleasure for me to be back in Jerusalem. When I arrived
at the hotel and I looked out, the sun was shining brightly on the walls of
the great Old City, and it’s always a privilege to be able to see that site
and to think of all of the history that is wrapped up for so many different
people, and particularly, obviously, for Israelis today witnessing the
difficulties that the prime minister has just referred to, and dealing with
the possibilities of peace, but a possibility of peace that is always
challenged by day-to-day contradictions and day-to-day realities.

I’m particularly grateful to Bibi for his hospitality. He always makes
significant time available to me when I come here. We have intense and
productive rounds of discussions. And we have been at this now for five
months solid into six months. I think it’s safe to say that we know what the
issues are. We know the parameters and the possibilities of peace. And as I
said not so many months ago at Ben Gurion Airport as I left, the time is
soon arriving where leaders are going to have to make difficult decisions.
We are close to that time, if not at it, and I think we understand the
circumstances within which we are working.

I know – I come here with no illusions – I know that there are many who are
skeptical of whether or not the two parties can achieve peace. But I will
tell you that I have personally learned something about the power of
reconciliation. And whether or not Israelis think about it every day, so
have you. In 1967, there was a war, and Jordan was on the other side of that
war, and land very close to the hotel I stay in was the dividing line, and
Jordan was on the other side of that line. Today, Jordan has made peace and
is a partner in an effort to try to change things and move forward and be

On a personal level, last month I traveled to Vietnam on my first visit
there as Secretary of State. And the transformation in our relationship – I
was a young soldier who fought there – the transformation in our
relationship is proof that as painful as the past can be, through hard work
of diplomacy history’s adversaries can actually become partners for a new
day and history’s challenges can become opportunities for a new age.

Those of us who were lucky enough to come back from the war in Vietnam had a
simple saying: Every day is extra. And I have always thought that’s a
beautiful expression. It’s a way of saying that we honor those who we lost
by continuing their work and helping others and trying to achieve what they
fought for. And so it is true here and can be true here. My many visits to
Israel have shown me how this same sense prevails among some of the world’s,
if not the world’s strongest survivors – the Jewish people.

This is my tenth trip to Israel as Secretary of State. And every time I
visit, Israel’s security concerns are uppermost in my mind. I understand the
nature of the security threat here. I know what it’s like to live in Israel
with, once upon a time, Katyusha rockets coming to Kiryat Shmona, or rockets
from Gaza coming into Sderot. I understand it. Every time I visit, those
concerns are part of my consideration, and that is why President Obama and I
remain deeply committed to ensuring that as a result of peace, Israel and
Israelis feel more secure, not less. That’s our objective. And that’s why
the United States will continue to play a leading role in building both
Israeli capacity for Israel to defend itself by itself, but also Palestinian
capabilities to address their security needs in the context of statehood.

The commitment of the United States to Israel is ironclad. We know that
Israel has to be strong to make peace. And we also know that peace will make
Israel stronger not just with its near neighbors, but throughout the world.

So I come here today to continue this ongoing conversation about how to end
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We are now five full months into this
negotiation. We have always known that achieving peace is a long and
complicated process. It’s a tough road. But this is not mission impossible.
I would note the recent poll by Hebrew University and the Palestinian Center
for Policy and Survey Research which shows the majorities of Israelis and
Palestinians back two-state solution, though both remain suspicious of the
other side. Despite the fact that we are discussing really difficult,
complicated issues, I am encouraged that the parties remain engaged and
substantive discussions are taking place on the core issues.

The United States has remained in close contact with both sides, and we are
committed to working with both parties to reach a permanent status agreement
that will end conflict and all claims. I particularly want to thank Prime
Minister Netanyahu’s very difficult decision. Believe me, I know how
difficult the decision was, and I know that in some quarters here that
decision is not accepted – not only not easily, but not at all.
Nevertheless, the Prime Minister stuck by his guns and I commend him for his
courage and his willingness to follow through with something that we believe
can keep us on track and help us bring a peace to Israel and to the
Palestinians. I commend him, and I commend President Abbas, who also has
been under pressure – there are many on his side who say break away, don’t
bother, don’t – this isn’t going to go anywhere, and who argue with him that
he is on an illusory path.

So I plan to work with both sides more intensely in these next days to
narrow the differences on a framework that will provide the agreed
guidelines for permanent status negotiations. This will take time and it
will take compromise from both sides, but an agreed framework would be a
significant breakthrough. It would address all of the core issues. It would
create the fixed, defined parameters by which the parties would then know
where they are going and what the end result can be. It would address all of
the core issues that we have been addressing since day one, including
borders, security, refugees, Jerusalem, mutual recognition, and the end of
conflict and of all claims.

Now, I want to emphasize that the discussion of an agreed framework has
emerged from the ideas that both parties have put on the table. My role is
not to impose American ideas on either side but to facilitate the parties’
own efforts. An agreed framework would clarify and bridge the gaps between
the parties so that they can move towards a final peace treaty that would
resolve all of those core issues.

President Obama and I are deeply committed to this process. President Obama
came here in March, and at that time he committed the United States and me
particularly to this effort, with an understanding that the possibilities
provided by peace are dramatic and they are worth struggling for: Two states
for two peoples living side-by-side in peace and stability and security.
Peace is possible today, I believe, because the leaders – Prime Minister
Netanyahu and President Abbas – have both each taken significant steps for
peace notwithstanding the difficulties that the Prime Minister has cited –
and they are real. But still we are on this track, and I believe that they
are both willing to take more.

In the weeks and months ahead, both sides are going to need to make tough
choices to ensure that peace is not just a possibility but is a reality for
Israelis and Palestinians for now and for future generations. So that’s what
lies ahead of us. It is hard work, but with a determined effort, I’m
convinced that we can get there. I’m happy to wish all the folks here a
Happy New Year – at least by our calendar. I’m working on three calendars
now, so I get to do three times a Happy New Year during the year, but I wish
you from us, on our calendar, a very Happy New Year. And may we be
successful in these efforts. Thank you.



Search For An Article


Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)