|
Tuesday, January 30, 2024 |
Technical Note: "Quiet for Quiet" was the Concept Which Failed |
Technical Note: "Quiet for Quiet" was the Concept Which Failed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview with British TV That was not the "concept" whose failure cost us so dearly on October 7th. "Quiet for quiet" failed. And it is critical for policymakers to understand this. Because to this day, they yearn for "quiet for quiet." It is important to understand what "quiet" means under "quiet for quiet." Quiet = do not shoot (too much). This is what is allowed under "quiet for quiet": 1. Importation, development and mass production of any and all weapons. This 2. Any and all training exercises are allowed in preparation for attacking 3. The erection of forward positions, both for the purposes of observation 4. Major civil works (tunnels, etc.) to be used against Israel are recorded These rules applied with few exceptions both towards the Gaza Strip and In the case of Lebanon, the results were particularly obvious over the If the above activities had been designated as "noise," the situation today "Quiet for quiet" is the policy for those who are interested only in the It is like a CEO whose bonus is based on the performance of his company's To be clear: Mr. Netanyahu was in good company embracing "quiet for quiet." Everyone around him embraced it. The fantasy that our enemies were "deterred" rather than "patient" was a Unless policymakers recognize this fatal conceptual flaw, we are doomed to ________________________________________ Since 1992 providing news and analysis on the Middle East with a focus on Website: www.imra.org.il |
| ||
Search For An Article |
POB 982 Kfar Sava Tel 972-9-7604719 Fax 972-3-7255730 |
email:imra@netvision.net.il | IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES |